Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 7 de 7
1.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 10: 1154129, 2023.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37234378

Background: Invasive double-valve endocarditis with structural damage (abscess or perforation) of the aorto-mitral curtain is a relatively rare but fatal diagnosis requiring complex surgical reconstruction. This study presents the short-term and mid-term outcomes from a single center. Methods: From 2014 to 2021, 20 patients with double-valve endocarditis with structural damage of the aorto-mitral curtain underwent surgical reconstruction (Hemi-Commando procedure n = 16 and Commando procedure n = 4). Data were obtained retrospectively. Results: In 13 cases, the procedure was a reoperation. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 239 ± 47 min and the mean cross-clamp time was 186 ± 32 min. Concomitant procedures were tricuspid valve repair in two, coronary revascularization in one, closure of a ventricular septal defect in one and hemiarch (using circulatory arrest) in one patient. Eleven patients (55%) required surgical revision for bleeding. Thirty-day mortality was 30% (6 patients)-3 patients from the Hemi-Commando group (19%) and 3 patients from the Commando group (75%). Overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 60%, 50% and 45% respectively. Reoperation was required by 4 patients. Freedom from reoperation at 1, 3 and 5 years was 86%, 71% and 71% respectively. Conclusion: Despite the high postoperative morbidity and mortality, complex surgical reconstruction of the aorto-mitral continuity of patients with double-valve endocarditis represents the only real chance for survival. Mid-term outcomes are acceptable, but strict follow-up is required due to the risk of valve failure.

2.
J Cardiothorac Surg ; 18(1): 43, 2023 Jan 20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36670443

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking has been associated with an increased risk of complications after conventional coronary surgery. However, the impact of smoking on the risk of postoperative complications in minimally invasive coronary surgery is yet to be studied. We aimed to analyze the impact of the preoperative smoking status on the short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) in the context of isolated surgical revascularization or in association with percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of all patients undergoing MIDCAB at our institution between 2006 and 2020. Patients were divided into three groups: active smokers, ex-smokers who have quit smoking for at least 1 month before surgery, and non-smokers. The groups were compared using conventional statistical methods. Multivariate analysis was then performed where significant differences were found to eliminate bias. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, 541 patients underwent MIDCAB, of which 135 (25%) were active smokers, 183 (34%) were ex-smokers, and 223 (41%) were non-smokers. Smokers presented for surgery at a younger age (p < 0.0001), more frequently with a history of myocardial infarction (p < 0.001), peripheral artery disease (p < 0.001) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p < 0.0001). Using multivariate analysis, active smoking was determined to be a significant risk factor for the need of urgent revascularization (odds ratio 2.36 [1.00-5.56], p = 0.049) and the composite of pulmonary complications (including pneumothorax, respiratory infection, respiratory dysfunction, subcutaneous emphysema and exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; odds ratio 2.84 [1.64-4.94], p < 0.001). Preoperative smoking status did not influence the long-term survival (p = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, active smokers presented for MIDCAB at a younger age and more often with signs of atherosclerotic disease (history of myocardial infarction and peripheral artery disease). Active smoking was found to be the most significant risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications, and is also associated with a more frequent need for urgent surgery at diagnosis. Long-term postoperative survival is not affected by the preoperative smoking status.


Myocardial Infarction , Peripheral Arterial Disease , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Humans , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Treatment Outcome , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Smoking/adverse effects , Tobacco Smoking , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
3.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 943076, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36110419

Background: Robotic assistance (RA) in the harvesting of internal thoracic artery during minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCAB) provides several potential benefits for surgeon and patient in comparison with conventional MIDCAB. The two technical options have not been thoroughly compared in the literature yet. We aimed to perform this in our cohort with the use of propensity-score matching (PSM). Methods: This was a retrospective comparison of all consecutive patients undergoing conventional MIDCAB (2005-2021) and RA-MIDCAB (2018-2021) at our institution with the use of PSM with 27 preoperative covariates. Results: Throughout the study period 603 patients underwent conventional and 132 patients underwent RA-MIDCAB. One hundred and thirty matched pairs were selected for further comparison. PSM successfully eliminated all preoperative differences. Patients after RA-MIDCAB had lower 24 h blood loss post-operatively (300 vs. 450 ml, p = 0.002). They had shorter artificial ventilation time (6 vs. 7 h, p = 0.018) and hospital stay (6 vs. 8 days, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the risk of perioperative complications, short-term and mid-term mortality between the groups. Conclusions: RA-MIDCAB is an attractive alternative to conventional MIDCAB. It is associated with lower post-operative blood loss and potentially faster rehabilitation after surgery. The mortality and the risk of perioperative complications are comparable among the groups.

4.
Virchows Arch ; 481(5): 731-738, 2022 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35982277

Medial degeneration is the most common histological finding in ascending aortic aneurysms with lesser but significant involvement by atherosclerosis. The overall extent and severity can be potentially underrated because of their uneven distribution and macroscopic inconspicuousness of medial degeneration. This study aims to compare the distribution of degenerative and atherosclerotic lesions around ascending aorta circumference, also considering aortic valve cuspidity. We evaluated 88 cases of resected ascending aortae, 25 with a tricuspid aortic valve and 63 with a malformed aortic valve, oriented by a cardiac surgeon and sent for pathological examination. We applied the consensus documents from 2015 and 2016 for microscopic evaluation of aortic specimens. The medial degeneration and atherosclerosis were graded semi-quantitatively for each aortic quadrant: convexity, anterior wall, concavity, and posterior wall. Nearly all quadrants showed at least mild medial degeneration; more severe findings of medial degeneration and atherosclerosis were in the aneurysms associated with the tricuspid valve. In the aneurysms with the tricuspid aortic valve, there was more frequent and more severe atherosclerosis at the concavity than at the anterior wall (p = .046); the frequency and severity of medial degeneration did not differ significantly. The aneurysms with a malformed aortic valve showed more severe medial degeneration at the concavity compared to the convexity (p = .011); atherosclerosis was less common and did not show any significant differences. More than half of the samples also revealed at least a one-grade (mostly one-grade) difference among the quadrants in individual cases for both atherosclerosis and medial degeneration. Extreme differences were rare except for atherosclerosis in the tricuspid group. The results revealed only slight overall differences around the aortic circumference, with concavity being the most susceptible. Still, thanks to occurring inter- and intraindividual variability, the examination of all quadrants seems meaningful not to miss the most severe changes and to underscore the findings.


Aortic Aneurysm , Atherosclerosis , Humans , Aortic Aneurysm/complications , Aortic Aneurysm/pathology , Aorta/pathology , Aortic Valve/pathology , Atherosclerosis/complications , Atherosclerosis/pathology
5.
Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol ; 19(1): 36-40, 2022 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35414819

Introduction: Primary cardiac tumors are a rare condition presenting with a variety of symptoms. The outcomes of their surgical treatment in the modern era from central Europe have not been recently reported. Aim: To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of the cardiac tumor operations at our department throughout the last 20 years. Material and methods: This was a retrospective analysis of all primary cardiac tumor operations performed at our institution between 2000 and 2020. Perioperative data were extracted from patient records. Long-term data were provided by the National Registry of Cardiac Surgery. Results: Sixty procedures for primary cardiac tumor were performed throughout the study period. The most common type of tumor was myxoma (88%), followed by fibroelastoma (8%), lipoma (2%) and sarcoma (2%). There were 2 perioperative deaths (3%). The most common perioperative complication was atrial fibrillation (47%). One (2%) patient underwent reoperation 6 years later because of myxoma recurrence. We recorded 13 long-term deaths, but only 1 patient died as a consequence of cardiac tumor (sarcoma) 15 months after the surgery. Long-term survival of the cohort was comparable with the age- and sex-matched general population up to 15 years postoperatively (relative survival 0.91, CI 0.68-1.23). Rich histopathological illustrations are provided in the online supplementary material. Conclusions: Surgical resection is the standard treatment of primary cardiac tumors. The outcomes of benign tumors are excellent and the long-term postoperative survival is comparable with the general population. The prognosis of malignant tumors remains poor.

7.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 19(3): 182-90, 2014 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24944819

AIM: To compare radiotherapy plans made according to CT and PET/CT and to investigate the impact of changes in target volumes on tumour control probability (TCP), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) and the impact of PET/CT on the staging and treatment strategy. BACKGROUND: Contemporary studies have proven that PET/CT attains higher sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of lung cancer and also leads to higher accuracy than CT alone in the process of target volume delineation in NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between October 2009 and March 2012, 31 patients with locally advanced NSCLC, who had been referred to radical radiotherapy were involved in our study. They all underwent planning PET/CT examination. Then we carried out two separate delineations of target volumes and two radiotherapy plans and we compared the following parameters of those plans: staging, treatment purpose, the size of GTV and PTV and the exposure of organs at risk (OAR). TCP and NTCP were also compared. RESULTS: PET/CT information led to a significant decrease in the sizes of target volumes, which had the impact on the radiation exposure of OARs. The reduction of target volume sizes was not reflected in the significant increase of the TCP value. We found that there is a very strong direct linear relationship between all evaluated dosimetric parameters and NTCP values of all evaluated OARs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that the use of planning PET/CT in the radiotherapy planning of NSCLC has a crucial impact on the precise determination of target volumes, more precise staging of the disease and thus also on possible changes of treatment strategy.

...